Why are Republicans Forcing a Shutdown of Government? This is the ledership to a preemptive thought bubble blown earlier. i.e. I thought that the Republicans are going to force a shut down because they have already blamed one on the Democrats just as the Democrats are about to present their compromise. Now this is not to predict a shutdown, but it is easy for the Republicans to predict one. And indeed it may only be in the Democrats power to force one. Just look at Wisconsin. Woops, even their out of state filibuster did not stop the Republicans. Now, cutting the jest and my tangent. Back to the thought bubble. The Republicans may force a shutdown to blame the Democrats, or the Democrats may force a shutdown to hold their horses. It seems that false equivalents, make it either the Trojan Horse or the Four Horseman. But back to my thought bubble, I just said that.
{Further leaking of nuance and exceptionalism, the so-called Constitutionalists, orginal intenders, and frackin' flip-floppin' neo-cons or Libertarians forget all about the Bush administration and the congressional behaviour then. As I have sketchily outlined the constitution and the war powers act and the partiot act, the president is within his powers until the law or the spirit changes it. How much Iron Knee or I Ron Knee is there that the UN Libya resolution is Numbered 1973? Or that the Patriot act was just extended?
BTW: Freedom is not a license, in reaction to or spin-off of Bill Maher, in respect to the requirement of humor for him and not Beck or O'Reilly, and I might add or Trump a few others.
Hint: on labels and scroll-over tangent I have not always read nor will I read (or reread)all links that are embedded in my blog. But I do wish to note them as sometimes serving as footnotes which I sometimes google post post, which sometimes may just be scrolled over or glannced at after clicking on to get the gist of.
[Toxic Leak? I am concerned with the roles that government spouses play. Not to mention Media Matters and its battle with FOX related to its non-profit status. But let me burst my thought bubble. The Republicans may not hold together on the ability to shut it down, but it will likely be another extention. I don't think either side wants to shut it down, but look who's talking.]
[Speaking of breaking or thought: here is the why, which will be inserted later, but it is for now to get the Democrats to move, and blame them for failure when the Republicans can move the line away a better economy. Stuck bubble: Should Corporate Executive go to jail for killing people? No, since corporations are people the whole corporations should. Just being facitious but really, they should be paying the same taxe rates as people, and have passports.]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query I ron knee. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query I ron knee. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Not to Follow-Up...
...Or Down*
But that's the ticket.
While I did read the 2nd link, I have only glanced at the Sorkin critique and I am surprised at the criticism for the creator of Newsroom. Not an HBO subscriber, I only saw the first episode OnDemand and was very impressed with the whole deal. I don't know if I will have the same perspective of Alex Pereene if I could have seen the later episodes. Not that I was that impressed or critical of him to begin with. I thought he was fair and balanced, but not in the way it has come to be taken. This actually this does follow from my not going that far and how some get** where they are.
My second line will be more fully digested later, and provide more fair and balanced context.
* actually it might follow(the only piece I have fully digested)
** BaneOr Side Show
*** anachronistic irony (I Ron Knee, Iron Knee of Bowles-Simpson/Balanced Solution)
[The Romney Tax problem is a sideshow so that they can say that Obama won't talk about the economy. Republicans have been unprecedented obstuctionists so they can run against*** the economy, rather than the choice between more change and turning around to go back to what took us down. Now that is a follow up.]
But that's the ticket.
While I did read the 2nd link, I have only glanced at the Sorkin critique and I am surprised at the criticism for the creator of Newsroom. Not an HBO subscriber, I only saw the first episode OnDemand and was very impressed with the whole deal. I don't know if I will have the same perspective of Alex Pereene if I could have seen the later episodes. Not that I was that impressed or critical of him to begin with. I thought he was fair and balanced, but not in the way it has come to be taken. This actually this does follow from my not going that far and how some get** where they are.
My second line will be more fully digested later, and provide more fair and balanced context.
* actually it might follow(the only piece I have fully digested)
** BaneOr Side Show
*** anachronistic irony (I Ron Knee, Iron Knee of Bowles-Simpson/Balanced Solution)
[The Romney Tax problem is a sideshow so that they can say that Obama won't talk about the economy. Republicans have been unprecedented obstuctionists so they can run against*** the economy, rather than the choice between more change and turning around to go back to what took us down. Now that is a follow up.]
Monday, October 01, 2012
Rocket Man?[!]
...OFF ?
The launch pad is another matter but it takes 3 points to make a plane, and this is a blank 'f 'n odd footnote. But stinking to the story or retro-jets, this is the 4th post-note or footnote*.
* anachronism may be moved/adjusted later
[The point for now is that I am behind on the follow-up in the area of the first three posts for this month. And then after the last bulky post and plan to asterisk or footnote, found that those original 3 had many of the images I had just 4-matted un-a-knew[!] Now that is the ticket. Almost.
g. 4A? FOOTNOTES:
SEPTEMBER 2012
h. Catch-22?
j. (anomoly^ of al gore rhythm and heading?)
k.
l.
m.
n.
Oh and the reality is that things change, not that they are right in the first or next place, but for now I think I have logged the links correctly if not as planned.
2-point-oh... and "lables"la not LGF for now.
^ (b.s.)= blog search 4 (sic)+pun and at this time includes "a." thru "n." which will off** course change with time if not also algorithms of BlogSpot beyond my understanding. But one anomoly of that sort appears just as I switched 4mat between "i." and "j.", not that I did not trigger something I just don't know why I chose to save some time and effort if not meaning and the "headings" switched from being self-linked to prior linked, upon scrolling over them. In
the Mean Time... ... SIX
SIGMA . And I better stop now before who knows what.
Stardate: 10.18.12.9.53pdt
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Iron Knee?
Or I Ron Knee?
My first instinct was based on, this can't be right, could it? I guess it can. But the Immelt to Jobs is like a Nixon to China ploy. Unfortunately, that foreign policy reference may have backfired a bit, military friction has become economic friction. But a better word would be competition. Or would it?
But really, I am conflating two fields into one, or is it a third? The Tax Code. While it is not all about who's at fault, tax cuts or spending, or economic or foreign policy, having the biggest con(I mean beneficiary of tax policy and foreign policy) pushing for an overhaul, we just may eliminate many loopholes and level the playing field a bit. And as for contrast, Obama to Libya is NOT the Bush to Iraq or Cheesehead to Wisconsin moment.
[On another line: Democrats can hold the line and compromise, as long as there is a line that some Republicans will greet.
My first instinct was based on, this can't be right, could it? I guess it can. But the Immelt to Jobs is like a Nixon to China ploy. Unfortunately, that foreign policy reference may have backfired a bit, military friction has become economic friction. But a better word would be competition. Or would it?
But really, I am conflating two fields into one, or is it a third? The Tax Code. While it is not all about who's at fault, tax cuts or spending, or economic or foreign policy, having the biggest con(I mean beneficiary of tax policy and foreign policy) pushing for an overhaul, we just may eliminate many loopholes and level the playing field a bit. And as for contrast, Obama to Libya is NOT the Bush to Iraq or Cheesehead to Wisconsin moment.
[On another line: Democrats can hold the line and compromise, as long as there is a line that some Republicans will greet.
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
Proxymoron?
Romney/Ryan* - "Social Darwinism"
Make no mistake, I am not associating President Obama with Proxymoron for using "Social Darwinism" wrong. I am not using Social Darwinism as it is commonly** used, since it evolves.
** "common sense is not so common"
Related proxy-aphorism? Counter-Rush or Tea Party or FOX Think.
*** If corporations have become persons, what is society?
Further sources of comment on this event.
The White House (the event: AP Luncheon)
[I Ron Knee of the Bottom Line? That I have yet to listen to the full speech.]
(Footnote: last link entered simul-speech about 14:40 on. Mitt Maligns Marvelous!)
[Loopholes? The Mitt Medvedev Moment. By George. Apologies for the tongue in cheek or cubism on the side but please Ctrl F "Loopholes"under the bold MMM.]
[Other Message Mean 'm, or Forum or 40m mark in video? Check that, 38 minutes, first question, not to mention BS remark. Grand Slam ? Or B in GO!]
[Speaking of GPS: "What we have here" is a Galley Project SimpBowlized, by the deficit commission and the Kitchen/Boat math, marvelous mangling and tale gating. (Also see 2 comments.)]
[P.S. under a Google of "AP Luncheon" I found this interesting Hoist by his own Picard by John Hull. A careful reading and reference to sources would indicate a hoist of his own profession not to mention his metaphorical name. My father had a boat made by Swiftsure. Three flushes you're out! The three strikes are A. the fact-check error. B. the Lockner v. New York error C. the Wickard v. Filburn error. In context: Obama is a "professor", Lockner v. New York was probably what Obama was referring to or in era in general, which John Hull flushes, and Wickard v. Filburn recognized the power of the federal government to regulate economic activity. I mean, the gizzard of that guy.]
8-16-12
P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)
8-16-12
P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)
Monday, January 23, 2012
Update
Somewhere I may have noted that Herman Cain said he would have a surprise before the South Carolina primaries. I haven't found that reference, but I wonder if this was it.
Speaking of Updates.
Not to mention Martin Bashir and Heads Examined. Tea Party Nation leader endorses candidate who literally* in his own words, needs his head examined. Who wants anybody to be on food stamps? Certainly not the president. The Gingrich claim that Obama is the "food stamp president" while coming close to being... [1-24-12: I chose to break mid-semantics as to the truth of claims. Judson Philips quote: "if you want someone to be on food stamps you really ought have your head examined" yet Gingrich thinks that is what Obama wants.** If you think the NAACP should demand pay checks not food stamps, what does that make you? That is what Gingrich charged them with.]
*1-24-12 in con text m/un-con science links/break
[?]
[To be read: Ryan Lizza The New Yorker, The Obama Memos.]
[1-27-12]
Friday, April 27, 2012
Tetra Heed Ron
of I Ron Knee[!]
Mitt: The Real European
Now apparently it’s a “slam” to say Paul Ryan likes Ayn Rand***
Self-awareness, Republican-style
Minimum-wage misconceptions
Mitt-Flop* of Golden Rule and the bottom-line**.
* could have sworn I heard it on Norman Goldman
** I think we should play up the Joint JD/MBA card, vs. the community/constitutional prof.
[I mean what business practices would benefit government? Profits or Bankruptcy? It's not six of one half dozen of the other. However, a card from the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, may be telling. But this is a far cry from the Krugman/Bernstein crack at the Mitt-Flop.]
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Who are you going to call?
Ghost Busters!
Actually these are not the most current** or accurate links. I believe it was Halloween when the question arose. Just who are these guys trying to be? Or not to be [!] Nor Hamlet, nie* 2016.
Actually, that is one point. For Republicans it is all about 2016. Not that what happens in 2011 stays in 2011[!] But the question I beg, is who are the flavors of the month trying be? Romney is the supposed shoe in. Cain and Perry seem to be going for broke***.
* mystery googleor just(sic?) typo?
** GOP CNBC debate
*** I Ron Knee Chef [!]
[*] no there is no [bracketed asterisk] above
[the answer my friend, is blowing in the wind, not to mention what Perry forgot.]
[I mean, is it really believable that Perry could not remember the Department of Energy? After Education and Commerce(note update)]
[Actually I should remember that making light of some, may be giving them too much cred it. (speaking of credit)]
Actually these are not the most current** or accurate links. I believe it was Halloween when the question arose. Just who are these guys trying to be? Or not to be [!] Nor Hamlet, nie* 2016.
Actually, that is one point. For Republicans it is all about 2016. Not that what happens in 2011 stays in 2011[!] But the question I beg, is who are the flavors of the month trying be? Romney is the supposed shoe in. Cain and Perry seem to be going for broke***.
* mystery googleor just(sic?) typo?
** GOP CNBC debate
*** I Ron Knee Chef [!]
[*] no there is no [bracketed asterisk] above
[the answer my friend, is blowing in the wind, not to mention what Perry forgot.]
[I mean, is it really believable that Perry could not remember the Department of Energy? After Education and Commerce(note update)]
[Actually I should remember that making light of some, may be giving them too much cred it. (speaking of credit)]
Tuesday, January 01, 2013
FOOTNOTES (Janurary 2013) PAGE ONE
THIS IS THE FOOTNOTE PAGE ONE !!!
...FOR JANUARY 2013!
Begun 1-3-13(appropriately)
[!] punctuation = irony/sarcasm/pun
(now to scroll up or down...that is the question) (fn2)
(fn3) anachronistic (b.s.) blog search 1-3-13 "me me"(sc)
"but seriously" Killer Ad from Killer Group(sc)
Out Foxed? ...knot!(fn4)
--- --- ---
1-3-13 [^] Clog Alert! For later parsing the (b.s.) of Clog and Clogs, but now for the "Rodney".
Stay the Comity of Course (sc*) , P.M. , Spare the Rodney! , #1 Discipline - Philosophy , Give an inch, Take a mile.
*ouch : Stay the Comity of Course / Ctrl F (SC) (spare me: fn2)
1-4-13: [p.s. on (fn) (b.s.)] Pop Yogurt[!], Now this is the ticket., A Revolution?, A wonder..., Where everyone needs to read...
1-4-13 (fn) date noted Pre-Capitalization i.e. posted Friday for Sat.
1-5-13 Try-Mentionalism ?[!] Normal post/time stamp.
" You know ": by Stiob?!?, I'm not saying..., Flip-Flop, Nuance, Mitt-Flop, The Other Debates, FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012, Dimentionalism(sic)(sc), Frackin' Trickle Down(sc), Bridging the English Channel(sc)?
(sc) scroll click anomoly (swift creak?)
I Ron Knee (Iron ne) of Progress.
1-7-13 Punchline? Level Three. Last Resorts?
1-8-13 (1) Change of Tune? See this heading! (fn)HAPPY NEW YEAR[!]
RE:TITLED THIS PAGE
(1) Fearnauts , Pre-Capitalization , December FOOTNOTES 2.0 , December 3G FOOTNOTES, BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger" , Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. , Turning the Page (2.0) , Turning the page (On Humor)? , THE COUNCIL OF NICE , ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]
1-11-13 CapTenseLog (English+only)? Not found under Ctrl F "as is", i.e. interesting Al Gore Rhythm
1-14-13 UnTense? (*) before I go all footnutty... [2] {un in ten did undid but 90 =uncap brackets (qwerty CAP'd or De-bubba upped?}
1-16-13 Ouch. Grid Irony and Tour de'F(LA)? Or should I say Off Law?[1]
= = =
1-18-13 SoDo Amalgam /Post-PAGES: FC, TBA/\ (bs): The Real B. S. of the F. C., FC "Hammer", In "F"n able?, QCON* - JERRY FALWELL OPENS LAW SCHOOL (may he ... live strong and prosper)
...FOR JANUARY 2013!
Begun 1-3-13(appropriately)
[!] punctuation = irony/sarcasm/pun
(now to scroll up or down...that is the question) (fn2)
(fn3) anachronistic (b.s.) blog search 1-3-13 "me me"(sc)
"but seriously" Killer Ad from Killer Group(sc)
Out Foxed? ...knot!(fn4)
--- --- ---
1-3-13 [^] Clog Alert! For later parsing the (b.s.) of Clog and Clogs, but now for the "Rodney".
Stay the Comity of Course (sc*) , P.M. , Spare the Rodney! , #1 Discipline - Philosophy , Give an inch, Take a mile.
*ouch : Stay the Comity of Course / Ctrl F (SC) (spare me: fn2)
1-4-13: [p.s. on (fn) (b.s.)] Pop Yogurt[!], Now this is the ticket., A Revolution?, A wonder..., Where everyone needs to read...
1-4-13 (fn) date noted Pre-Capitalization i.e. posted Friday for Sat.
1-5-13 Try-Mentionalism ?[!] Normal post/time stamp.
" You know ": by Stiob?!?, I'm not saying..., Flip-Flop, Nuance, Mitt-Flop, The Other Debates, FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012, Dimentionalism(sic)(sc), Frackin' Trickle Down(sc), Bridging the English Channel(sc)?
(sc) scroll click anomoly (swift creak?)
I Ron Knee (Iron ne) of Progress.
1-7-13 Punchline? Level Three. Last Resorts?
1-8-13 (1) Change of Tune? See this heading! (fn)HAPPY NEW YEAR[!]
RE:TITLED THIS PAGE
(1) Fearnauts , Pre-Capitalization , December FOOTNOTES 2.0 , December 3G FOOTNOTES, BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger" , Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. , Turning the Page (2.0) , Turning the page (On Humor)? , THE COUNCIL OF NICE , ROW MAN #Sign [Numeral (i)]
1-11-13 CapTenseLog (English+only)? Not found under Ctrl F "as is", i.e. interesting Al Gore Rhythm
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2003/02/exercise-lie-or-confusion-original-of.html
, UPDATE
ONLY? ,
Democracy
Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)** , Comprehensive
English or Reform Immigration? , Axe
not what you can ,
FOOTNOTES:
SEPTEMBER 2012 ***INTENIONS SNAP , Fear
and Running , V
for Victim , Parallel
(Or Not So Pair o' Lax) Channels , QCON
and Flip-Flop: AN IRAN OUT , Flip-Flopper-Crafting
1-14-13 UnTense? (*) before I go all footnutty... [2] {un in ten did undid but 90 =uncap brackets (qwerty CAP'd or De-bubba upped?}
1-16-13 Ouch. Grid Irony and Tour de'F(LA)? Or should I say Off Law?[1]
= = =
1-18-13 SoDo Amalgam /Post-PAGES: FC, TBA/\ (bs): The Real B. S. of the F. C., FC "Hammer", In "F"n able?, QCON* - JERRY FALWELL OPENS LAW SCHOOL (may he ... live strong and prosper)
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Laughter is the Best Medicine?
This is not just a google of the day. It is about a search for meaning. It is not about two sides* agreeing so they must be right or the answer being in the middle of two extremes, but it is about what works maybe not being even on that line or plane. I take as a model, the constitution and its three branches, the legislative, the executive and the judicial, but what of they be, in the of, by and for? Well that would be from another speech but there is the preamble, not to mention the declaration. The point is that if two perspectives agree it does not make their agreement correct, there may be another perspective that gets them off the dime of the teeter totter. Not to mention if three agree it will get us anywhere, let alone progress or good. The recent UN action on Libya is a prime example of progress, not on the agreement that it receives in popular opinion, but that it is a change in the process. It is not a final solution, but it is an international community effort of which, we have only just begun to talk.
*on disagreement with involvment in Libya
[I take the stand that the President is within the spirit of the law until the law is respelled.]
[But myth** of the day? And based on two links back, this site is not necessarily a myth buster but maybe some reactions will.]
** links that follow are not exactly copacetic or flowing naturally, but I will point to the foundations of myth in this faux debunker. His arguments are too based on the myths that may be the subject of this piece. "Myth(one): Social Security didn’t create the deficit and shouldn’t be cut to fix it". Half true, and the other half not the only solution. Anything further may be besides the point. From Myth Two: "As long as voters consider(...), they will be." Well, duh. Fill in the blank. This guy is, in my mind,(using his own words)"... Exhibit A in why it is so hard to fix them." In some ways he misses his own myth or actual truth: "In other words, the myth misses the point. Whether Social Security continues to pay benefits at today’s rates isn’t a question of credit quality. It’s a question of politics and priorities." And his most destructive myth: "Which brings us to what may be the most destructive myth of all: The idea that Social Security is, fiscally speaking, an end in itself." And the height of I Ron Knee: "The discussion we need to have, then, isn’t simply whether we can pull the levers to bring Social Security into balance. That is easy." This might be Exibit B of mything with myths.
*on disagreement with involvment in Libya
[I take the stand that the President is within the spirit of the law until the law is respelled.]
[But myth** of the day? And based on two links back, this site is not necessarily a myth buster but maybe some reactions will.]
** links that follow are not exactly copacetic or flowing naturally, but I will point to the foundations of myth in this faux debunker. His arguments are too based on the myths that may be the subject of this piece. "Myth(one): Social Security didn’t create the deficit and shouldn’t be cut to fix it". Half true, and the other half not the only solution. Anything further may be besides the point. From Myth Two: "As long as voters consider(...), they will be." Well, duh. Fill in the blank. This guy is, in my mind,(using his own words)"... Exhibit A in why it is so hard to fix them." In some ways he misses his own myth or actual truth: "In other words, the myth misses the point. Whether Social Security continues to pay benefits at today’s rates isn’t a question of credit quality. It’s a question of politics and priorities." And his most destructive myth: "Which brings us to what may be the most destructive myth of all: The idea that Social Security is, fiscally speaking, an end in itself." And the height of I Ron Knee: "The discussion we need to have, then, isn’t simply whether we can pull the levers to bring Social Security into balance. That is easy." This might be Exibit B of mything with myths.
Monday, March 21, 2011
There was nothing...
necessarily prophetic meant with Third Time's the Charm. Or was there? It may have been the spin-off of either or and the likes of Beck and some evangelicals. Even just in the either or of "I'm just saying", which might be related to a silver lining, which only has three sides. There is the light, the dark and the actual cloud that matters. [SAVED IN DRAFT & CONTINUED & SUBMITTED 3-22-11) Third Times a Charm, means that if you look right, look left, cross the street, and there is a chicken already on the other side, you may have learned a lesson...or not. Not to be making light of recent tragedies, but that actually is the point. That nuclear energy is not on the same plane as air or traffic accidents. But back to the original point, that Third Times a Charm regards Toning Down the* Lines.
*Or were we?
[SUB-TEXT: the table and I Ron Knee.]
[Update: my original assessment before the air strikes began was that the President was following the letter of the law if not the spirit. I won't get into the spirit of the Patriot Act but is part of the law as well as the 1973 War Powers Act and the constitution. My point being that it is one thing to debate an action by the president, it is another to make a law determining or undermining his powers. Any reassessment will have to take into account the current politics as well as earlier circumstances not to mentiuon the politics then. It is that frame in which I am optimistic that change matters as well as who is in charge.]
[Footnote to power and politics not to mention economics.]
[Not exactly breaking, but one reason going to congress would not make sense. Would it make sense to make doing the right thing even more political? Would it make sense for journalists to be giving detailed intel to an enemy? The right thing being to save lives rather than waiting for a massacre. It can be wondered well why not other places, well then get some consensus, but some are in the past and others may be prevented in the future or nothing may change. And there may be a bonus feature[**] in this turkey on the table and that is the subject of war funding and the budget process or complacency.]
[**] 3-25-11 links added
*Or were we?
[SUB-TEXT: the table and I Ron Knee.]
[Update: my original assessment before the air strikes began was that the President was following the letter of the law if not the spirit. I won't get into the spirit of the Patriot Act but is part of the law as well as the 1973 War Powers Act and the constitution. My point being that it is one thing to debate an action by the president, it is another to make a law determining or undermining his powers. Any reassessment will have to take into account the current politics as well as earlier circumstances not to mentiuon the politics then. It is that frame in which I am optimistic that change matters as well as who is in charge.]
[Footnote to power and politics not to mention economics.]
[Not exactly breaking, but one reason going to congress would not make sense. Would it make sense to make doing the right thing even more political? Would it make sense for journalists to be giving detailed intel to an enemy? The right thing being to save lives rather than waiting for a massacre. It can be wondered well why not other places, well then get some consensus, but some are in the past and others may be prevented in the future or nothing may change. And there may be a bonus feature[**] in this turkey on the table and that is the subject of war funding and the budget process or complacency.]
[**] 3-25-11 links added
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
We Can't Wait
...for Republicans to come to their senses or be good for anyone but the 1%.*
Well that is not exactly what President Obama has said, but it should be pretty clear. But it is not.(Michael Lind) We can't wait till the American people understand.
While Mitch McConnell and John Boehner provide the non-sense, Michael Lind provides some relief with Morning Joe a bit more consideration, with Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski. Note that Morning Joe follows up with a panel on Rick Perry. More message on the mess age, later. While I agree that the Perry birther talk is silly, but it may be a convenient distraction from his tax plan. Convenient for the media but not the country. And convenient for the blame the "gotcha liberal media" strategy that seems very much a part of the Republican story. There is a catch-44.**
* one per-cent
** I Ron Knee of all it is clear.(last link inserted see 4th link/I mean fifth.
*** and understanding: that is another column
[Speaking of the fifth.***]
[Yes, there is an anacronism in my asterisk 3. I have yet to link another column. Not it.]
[See comments.]
Well that is not exactly what President Obama has said, but it should be pretty clear. But it is not.(Michael Lind) We can't wait till the American people understand.
While Mitch McConnell and John Boehner provide the non-sense, Michael Lind provides some relief with Morning Joe a bit more consideration, with Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski. Note that Morning Joe follows up with a panel on Rick Perry. More message on the mess age, later. While I agree that the Perry birther talk is silly, but it may be a convenient distraction from his tax plan. Convenient for the media but not the country. And convenient for the blame the "gotcha liberal media" strategy that seems very much a part of the Republican story. There is a catch-44.**
* one per-cent
** I Ron Knee of all it is clear.(last link inserted see 4th link/I mean fifth.
*** and understanding: that is another column
[Speaking of the fifth.***]
[Yes, there is an anacronism in my asterisk 3. I have yet to link another column. Not it.]
[See comments.]
Wednesday, May 07, 2014
SkyNet
Hawking, Colbert, Ryan, Sterling, MIT, Piketty.
FAA, FCC, and ATF must regulate drones. It is not so much what capital can do without labor or machines can do with intellegence, but...
What business, government and people do separately.
*
[update of sorts.]
[[ Owe what a web ... ]]
That's the ticket. The Ribble. The Iron Knee, or I Ron Knee of labelism and to reads or not two Reids. Have knot will travel. Knot 2 4 M that which I may not read so you may have to.
FAA, FCC, and ATF must regulate drones. It is not so much what capital can do without labor or machines can do with intellegence, but...
What business, government and people do separately.
*
[update of sorts.]
[[ Owe what a web ... ]]
That's the ticket. The Ribble. The Iron Knee, or I Ron Knee of labelism and to reads or not two Reids. Have knot will travel. Knot 2 4 M that which I may not read so you may have to.
Friday, February 01, 2013
FOOTNOTE PAGE THREE
2-12-13 : see image and flow (4F?)
2-13-13 : Plank (b.s.) A. The History of B.S., B. Health Care Summit (sc), C.Enough? (sc), D. , E. I'm not saying..., F. , G. Co-Wink-E-Dink?, H. A Shot in the Arm?, I. In the begining..., J. A PEAS meant... (sc), K.Two Points (sc), L. Legislation not politics!, M. Walking the Plank[!] (sc)
{L}:* review of (sc)=[Scroll Click]. The hyperlinked headings that are sorted from the (b.s.)=[blog search] are sometimes not to the post they head. Hence one can scroll and see that they are not the link under (sc). But the (sc) will contain the link of the heading.[ or as evolved 4-4-13 below*]
2-14-13 (F P too?) A. B. (sc) C. (sc)
2-28-13 (Breaking Bread?)
(b.s.) Irony+chef = Rocket Man?[!] , I Ron Knee Chef
(b.s.) Buffet+food= The Big Cheese (sc)
*4-4-13 (link inserted) (sc) evolved ABC's will be used to carry the link that is for some reason of the (b.s.)'s algorithms not in the heading.)
2-13-13 : Plank (b.s.) A. The History of B.S., B. Health Care Summit (sc), C.Enough? (sc), D. , E. I'm not saying..., F. , G. Co-Wink-E-Dink?, H. A Shot in the Arm?, I. In the begining..., J. A PEAS meant... (sc), K.Two Points (sc), L. Legislation not politics!, M. Walking the Plank[!] (sc)
{L}:* review of (sc)=[Scroll Click]. The hyperlinked headings that are sorted from the (b.s.)=[blog search] are sometimes not to the post they head. Hence one can scroll and see that they are not the link under (sc). But the (sc) will contain the link of the heading.[ or as evolved 4-4-13 below*]
2-14-13 (F P too?) A. B. (sc) C. (sc)
2-28-13 (Breaking Bread?)
(b.s.) Irony+chef = Rocket Man?[!] , I Ron Knee Chef
(b.s.) Buffet+food= The Big Cheese (sc)
*4-4-13 (link inserted) (sc) evolved ABC's will be used to carry the link that is for some reason of the (b.s.)'s algorithms not in the heading.)
Wednesday, January 04, 2012
I Ron Knee Chef
Ctrl F Kitchen
Obama Takes it to the Kitchen.
OK, Lawrence O'Donnell is not there yet.[*]
True Man Label: Bring it On.
* 1-5-11 Lawrence O'Donnell: McCain Courage, Mormon Cult(ure) and perfect family. (Mitt Romney)
Recess appointment is perfect politics. Make our** day. (not to get Harry) i.e. take it to court or the people
Is Obama the 75% man? Mitt may be politically perfect, or the least of how many evils?
Trump wanted some enthusiasm, but who am I to be enthused by the choice of an even weaker candidate to face Obama? I hope the Republicans give us their best. It is a process that just might do that. Unfortunately their best for some Republicans, Libertarians, and farther wrongs would be worse for the country. A flip-flopping un-nuanced Romney is their best shot. Someone more extreme*** would be better for the race and the country by allowing Obama to carry the middle left.
** dirty Truman and his spatula
[Later The Daily Caller and Neo-Nuanced R's. ]
*** link added (**also & Neo)
[Neo-Bush, Frank/Dodd and Obamanomics.]
[Rachel Maddow, Star Chamber]
[Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes, Thom Hartmann, Lawrence O'Donnell]
1-6-11 Paul Harvey, The Rest of the Story. "not really".
Jobs-check, Cuts-check, debt next, but that means revenue also. As for certainty?
Note: use of punctuation, (sic)/pun, "air quotes" or lack of... c-BTW/irony.
(Ctrl F: "best" link inserted above)
[Rachel Maddow follow up or vise verse us ? Steele and Obama!]
[Santorum: Civil ad cert'em, a lesson in logic and taking the 9th.]
[Lawrence O'Donnell follow-up and tetra heed run ! (c-1-5 "courage":It was noted that it would be a lack of courage for McCain not to endorse a Republican candidate at this late date. So he endorses after the first delegates have been selected? Typical fear of fear monger.)]
BTW: China Or Germany? Which Economy Stupid? This proves you can learn from others, but it doesn't say what.
Awkward Breaking(BTW/Less Embedded)News(Ein, Ein, Ayn?)
i.e. next post/segue!
Speaking of Newt Eyed Peas, what he said to the NAACP.
Just demand jobs instead of food stamps? Not to be snarky.
< previous post >
Obama Takes it to the Kitchen.
OK, Lawrence O'Donnell is not there yet.[*]
True Man Label: Bring it On.
* 1-5-11 Lawrence O'Donnell: McCain Courage, Mormon Cult(ure) and perfect family. (Mitt Romney)
Recess appointment is perfect politics. Make our** day. (not to get Harry) i.e. take it to court or the people
Is Obama the 75% man? Mitt may be politically perfect, or the least of how many evils?
Trump wanted some enthusiasm, but who am I to be enthused by the choice of an even weaker candidate to face Obama? I hope the Republicans give us their best. It is a process that just might do that. Unfortunately their best for some Republicans, Libertarians, and farther wrongs would be worse for the country. A flip-flopping un-nuanced Romney is their best shot. Someone more extreme*** would be better for the race and the country by allowing Obama to carry the middle left.
** dirty Truman and his spatula
[Later The Daily Caller and Neo-Nuanced R's. ]
*** link added (**also & Neo)
[Neo-Bush, Frank/Dodd and Obamanomics.]
[Rachel Maddow, Star Chamber]
[Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes, Thom Hartmann, Lawrence O'Donnell]
1-6-11 Paul Harvey, The Rest of the Story. "not really".
Jobs-check, Cuts-check, debt next, but that means revenue also. As for certainty?
Note: use of punctuation, (sic)/pun, "air quotes" or lack of... c-BTW/irony.
(Ctrl F: "best" link inserted above)
[Rachel Maddow follow up or vise verse us ? Steele and Obama!]
[Santorum: Civil ad cert'em, a lesson in logic and taking the 9th.]
[Lawrence O'Donnell follow-up and tetra heed run ! (c-1-5 "courage":It was noted that it would be a lack of courage for McCain not to endorse a Republican candidate at this late date. So he endorses after the first delegates have been selected? Typical fear of fear monger.)]
BTW: China Or Germany? Which Economy Stupid? This proves you can learn from others, but it doesn't say what.
Awkward Breaking(BTW/Less Embedded)News(Ein, Ein, Ayn?)
i.e. next post/segue!
Speaking of Newt Eyed Peas, what he said to the NAACP.
Just demand jobs instead of food stamps? Not to be snarky.
< previous post >
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Out of the Blue?
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Ryan/Romney run from Ryan plan..
Ryan runs from own plan endorsed by Romney.
Not Exactly.
The lies and hypocrisy know no pail.
Here is to Thomas Roberts. (Not... Today)*
*Links scrolling up.
(i.e. reverse order)
Rachel Maddow: Shrug Life **
Morning Joe: Romney "hate"/"chains" Biden
Today: Reince Priebus "blood"
Today: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Ryan Obama Pick?
Thomas Roberts under "Here". Who is Paul Ryan?
--
The Ed Show: unchained memory
**[?]
The Ed Show: Romney Medicare Lies
The Last Word: SNL Republican War Hypocrisy Ryan***
Lean Forward? Or go back. Ryan Fiscal Conservative?
TheLiaisonReport: Wikileaks Ryan
Lean Forward(or back [FOX] to Morning Joe) Cuts and Run.
The Last Word: Romney and Ryan run from Romney Plan
** Maddow Seg-way
***[Smoking Gun: Ryan votes against stimulus, says it works and takes funds for state.]
[The E Pit o'me of Nuance or Flip-Flop.(in reference to above layout, links and asterisks.]
[And this AM: Ryan runs from Wonk and Partisanship. That is a hoot, since he was on the BS Panel(Bowles-Simpson). Reminds me of Saving Pirate Ryan, and "going postal". The USPS(congressional failure) is the Iron Knee to Romney/Ryan I Ron Knee, Funding Bane Or...
(Note: Bane/Bain Boehner confluance and bracket of "Funding"(...)"Or" or Mitt Rob Me. The USPS is not going broke, anymore than the government is going broke, Republicans are breaking it by running their plan which ironically in moderation would solve so many problems. i.e. investment. But they are over-investing in the pension plan and at the same time hoping to privatise it. Won't that be a boon?) In proper context, pirates were a government program. Speaking of hole in the Hart.(AM)]
[See bold book ends: Shrug Life /The Last Word. Not exactly.]
[A last clip (Jon Stewart on The Cycle!) And the pie chart of fiscal irresponsibility does not even include the flip-flop of going austere and focusing on cutting the debt while cutting taxes as soon as the Republicans no longer led.]
Not Exactly.
The lies and hypocrisy know no pail.
Here is to Thomas Roberts. (Not... Today)*
*Links scrolling up.
(i.e. reverse order)
Rachel Maddow: Shrug Life **
Morning Joe: Romney "hate"/"chains" Biden
Today: Reince Priebus "blood"
Today: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Ryan Obama Pick?
Thomas Roberts under "Here". Who is Paul Ryan?
--
The Ed Show: unchained memory
**[?]
The Ed Show: Romney Medicare Lies
The Last Word: SNL Republican War Hypocrisy Ryan***
Lean Forward? Or go back. Ryan Fiscal Conservative?
TheLiaisonReport: Wikileaks Ryan
Lean Forward(or back [FOX] to Morning Joe) Cuts and Run.
The Last Word: Romney and Ryan run from Romney Plan
** Maddow Seg-way
***[Smoking Gun: Ryan votes against stimulus, says it works and takes funds for state.]
[The E Pit o'me of Nuance or Flip-Flop.(in reference to above layout, links and asterisks.]
[And this AM: Ryan runs from Wonk and Partisanship. That is a hoot, since he was on the BS Panel(Bowles-Simpson). Reminds me of Saving Pirate Ryan, and "going postal". The USPS(congressional failure) is the Iron Knee to Romney/Ryan I Ron Knee, Funding Bane Or...
(Note: Bane/Bain Boehner confluance and bracket of "Funding"(...)"Or" or Mitt Rob Me. The USPS is not going broke, anymore than the government is going broke, Republicans are breaking it by running their plan which ironically in moderation would solve so many problems. i.e. investment. But they are over-investing in the pension plan and at the same time hoping to privatise it. Won't that be a boon?) In proper context, pirates were a government program. Speaking of hole in the Hart.(AM)]
[See bold book ends: Shrug Life /The Last Word. Not exactly.]
[A last clip (Jon Stewart on The Cycle!) And the pie chart of fiscal irresponsibility does not even include the flip-flop of going austere and focusing on cutting the debt while cutting taxes as soon as the Republicans no longer led.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)